I was watching the debate between Johnson, Huhne and Grayling (yes worried readers he is still alive) getting increasingly angry with Huhne's position on short term custodial sentences. He has referred to them as a school for criminals that teach young, mainly men, new tricks and techniques that leads to a high re-offending rate (92%) after a first custodial sentence.
Can I offer an alternate opinion?
Often the courts have handed down many other sentences to these young offenders and they have made no difference to their behaviour patterns. Being in prison doesn't bother them in the slightest either. They just. Don't. Give a shit.
In my experience these people all know that the judicial system is not effective in curtailing their lifestyles. One individual that I know has been sentenced to community service (failed to attend), has been tagged (cut it off), has been fined (didn't pay it), for a number of separate violent offences and it made no difference to his behaviour patterns. After he spent three weeks on remand for his latest offence (that I know of) he was sentenced to a year on tag, weekly anger management counselling and weekly probation meetings. His probation officer decided (apparently) that he should not be tagged. He has attended one other probation session and none of the anger management sessions since his release six weeks ago. And that's it. The punishments for his actions have been somewhere between ineffectual and non-existent.
Why? Because he doesn't give a shit. He's young, he's single, no mortgage, no responsibility. Nothing that the government or the judicial system can do will alter his behaviour.
In some ways I think I should admire the lack of fear, the lack of respect of authority. The 'live for today and don't worry about the future' attitude that he, and others like him, exudes is definitely more appealing than the 'live long and dull' agenda of the prohibitionists. I can't though because his actions cause harm to others whether it's the person he has attacked, the person he stole from, the neighbours who are kept awake through the night by the volume of his music or the person who's property he damaged.
I don't have any answers. There is an ever larger sub-group of the population that is breeding a new generation of kids who are growing up not giving a shit. I don't want an authoritarian state where fear is used to control the public but at the same time I think the situation will only become worse unless some sort of changes are made to the current system.
Short custodial sentences are not currently the problem or the cure but the re-offending rates should focus attention on an issue that needs addressing. How do you make someone give a shit about our society?