After being found guilty Christine said
"I'm not a criminal, yet I have a conviction. I did not deliberately take the cat. The whole process has been very unfortunate. I think the cat's the victim."which is utterly mind boggling. Yes Christine you are a criminal because you have a conviction. You might have thought your actions were justified but a jury of your peers disagreed.
And just how the fuck does one "not deliberately" pick up a cat, put it under their arm, and walk away with it? Did the cat have a gun and force you to steal it? Did it blackmail you into abducting it from its home?
The process was "unfortunate"? As in, the criminal justice process unfortunately let the world know that you are a petty criminal? And yes, the cat is the victim. OF YOUR CRIME.
If this Coagulation makes any more cat gaffes this year .. .. .. ..
Posts
3 comments:
" I think the cat's the victim."
Well, actually, you revolting woman, it's the little girl who'll never know what became of her pet that's the victim. And all because the adults in her lives behaved with less decorum than, well, alley cats.
If the cat has not been seen since, then she should be charged with animal cruelty and endangerment and sent packing to prison or given capital punishment. Saving the animals is something the globalist leftists place a value on higher than human life. So accordingly, she should pay the price for her crime, of endangering that poor cat.
Maybe a happy ending after all..?
Post a Comment