All you gotta do is present them with the body that has lived life to the full, instead of a healthy carcase boringly pristine in every way. I'm going to be ditched in the skip.
I truly and honestly do not understand why so many people seem to consider organ donation 'ethical' while at the same time they think cannibalism in not.
When you think about it - why is using bits of a car-crash victim to keep another person alive so different if you use surgery as the means instead of direct consumption?
(I am explicitly not making a statement on the morality of either action, just that the distinction between them is technical at best, yet one is cosidered 'ethical' or even 'moral' while the other is considered vile and disgusting.)
Should you wish to contact me directly then please use the following email address with the usual adjustments.
manwiddicombeatlivedotcodotuk
follow me on twitter?
Copyright Notice
If you think it's worth copying then you have my permission to do so. If you'd like to link back to where you copied it from you could do that too. If ever I create anything that's worth protecting it probably won't be published here.
If you think I've breached your copyright then please contact me via the email address above.
4 comments:
All you gotta do is present them with the body that has lived life to the full, instead of a healthy carcase boringly pristine in every way.
I'm going to be ditched in the skip.
As a smoker, I'm donating nothing. What if they used one of my kidneys to keep Dreadful Arnott alive?
I'd spin in my grave so fast you could wrap my corpse in copper wire and power half the country.
Bastards.
Let them have fucking Steve Cram's mortal remains, they are getting fuck all from me.
Unless they can recycle and tax ashes, which they probably will do.
Is fucking VAT applied on funerals?
I truly and honestly do not understand why so many people seem to consider organ donation 'ethical' while at the same time they think cannibalism in not.
When you think about it - why is using bits of a car-crash victim to keep another person alive so different if you use surgery as the means instead of direct consumption?
(I am explicitly not making a statement on the morality of either action, just that the distinction between them is technical at best, yet one is cosidered 'ethical' or even 'moral' while the other is considered vile and disgusting.)
Post a Comment